On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Danny McPherson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> i had thought there was agreement at the last interim that
>> threats/requirements needed to get baked before the protocol doc move
>> to the next step in the process.
>
> While I am happy to hear this, it's not clear to me from the proceedings
> available, can you please provide a pointer?
sadly I can't find the notes on the interwebs... I'll see if we/chairs
forgot to post them, or my search-foo with webcrawler is crap.
I do note that there's a new revision ('new' as of 9/14-ish?) of threats:
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats>
requirements is still june-only:
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-reqs>
Did you get a chance (I think you had some questions/comments/etc
outstanding) to review -threats since 9/14?
-chris
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
