On Oct 11, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > i had thought there was agreement at the last interim that > threats/requirements needed to get baked before the protocol doc move > to the next step in the process.
While I am happy to hear this, it's not clear to me from the proceedings available, can you please provide a pointer? -danny _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
