On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Stephen Kent <[email protected]> wrote: > Randy, > >>>> hence the "per se," meaining in and of itself. some cases of pouring >>>> cement into a router (see london tube) are security issues, some are >>>> not. >>>> >>>> how would you make that more clear? >>> >>> I think Warren's suggestion of simply eliminating the assertion about >>> whether it's a security issue, per se or otherwise, and just saying >>> that it's out of scope is enough for the intro. >> >> i disagree. would be interested in hearing other opinions. >> > If just saying that it's out of scope allows us to move forward with this > doc, > that works for me.
Ok... did we cycle on to a solution to this conundrum? (the above seems ok to me) _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
