Randy, > while checking the docco, i found >>> >>> 3.14 While the trust level of a route should be determined by the >>> BGPsec protocol, local routing preference and policy MUST then >>> be applied to best path and other routing decisions. Such >>> mechanisms SHOULD conform with [I-D.ietf-sidr-ltamgmt]. >>> ... >>> 3.17 If a BGPsec design makes use of a security infrastructure, that >>> infrastructure SHOULD enable each network operator to select >>> the entities it will trust when authenticating data in the >>> security infrastructure. See, for example, >>> [I-D.ietf-sidr-ltamgmt].
What about adding that "the connection to this security infrastructure MUST be through a secure channel"? >>> >>> those references would seem to be obe. dunno what to do with the first, >>> drop it? the second might ref lta-use-cases. >> >> losing the last sentence in the first seems ok. and the second moving >> to use-cases seems ok to me... > > anyone else have input on this one, well, these two? Proposed changes sounds good. r. > > randy > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
