> Could you say please whether this means you support publication or you
> do not?
>
>> from a running router
>>
>> policy-statement rpki {
>> term valid {
>> from {
>> protocol bgp;
>> validation-database valid;
>> }
>> then {
>> validation-state valid;
>> community add whatever-the-heck-i-want;
>> accept;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> there is an invalid drop policy-statement too, but no sense for it to
>> set a community as it ain't goin' nowhere.
because the goal of this draft can already be reached simply through use
of existing means, i do not support publication. i am not strongly
opposed. it's just one more bit of ietf work that is not obviously
needed.
randy
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
