Sandra, I support this document moving forward to the IESG.
I read the document as part of the WGLC process and I believe the text is ready for publication. My only question is a formality from Section 3 that says: " If a BGP router supports prefix origin validation and is configure for the extensions defined in this document, the validation step SHOULD be performed prior to any of the steps defined in the decision process of [RFC4271<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4271>]." (Roque) Should this document specifically be labeled as an update to RFC4271? Regards, Roque On Apr 26, 2014, at 1:53 AM, Sandra Murphy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The authors of BGP Prefix Origin Validation State Extended Community, draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-04 have requested a WGLC. This message begins a two week WGLC, to end on 9 May 2014. The draft is available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling. Please do send comments to the list, indicating whether you do or do not believe that the draft is ready for publication. --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
