(as a working group person) I think it's an interesting topic to discuss, I'm a little worried that: "Because the third party said things are 'ok' I'll believe things are ok!"
mostly because I don't see a clear method to ensure that 'third party' has: 1) up-to-date information 2) my best interest at heart 3) current/appropriate configuration I suppose it's interesting to see another's view of the world, I don't necessarily want to believe it myself though. On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Sandra Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > The authors have requested working group adoption for > draft-kklf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light-01, "Signaling Prefix Origin > Validation Results from a Route-Server to Peers”. > > This message starts an adoption call that will end in two weeks on 11 May > 2016. > > Please respond on the list to say whether you support adoption of this > work as a working group work item AND whether you will participate in the > discussion. > > Remember that working group consensus to adopt the work needs responses, > not just absence of objection, so speak up. > > The draft is available at > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kklf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light-01 > > —Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs > > > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > >
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
