On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Matthias Waehlisch < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Chris, > > I'm not sure if I get your point. > > i might not either. > On Thu, 5 May 2016, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > > I think it's an interesting topic to discuss, I'm a little worried > > that: "Because the third party said things are 'ok' I'll believe > > things are ok!" > > > > mostly because I don't see a clear method to ensure that 'third party' > has: > > 1) up-to-date information > > > Same with RTR cache server. > > except I run the server and can get some data about how updated/etc it is with respect to collection of roa/etc data. > > 2) my best interest at heart > > > If you peer with a route server, you should establish a trust relation > anyway. > > maybe? how is an IX different from any direct peering? why would I trust elbonia telecom over elbonia-ix over myself? > > 3) current/appropriate configuration > > > Same with RTR cache erver. > > but that's something I can control, not trust the right thing happened > elsewhere (and I can monitor and maintain it) > > Cheers > matthias > > > -- > Dr. Matthias Waehlisch > . Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST > . Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany > .. mailto:[email protected] .. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl > :. Also: http://inet.haw-hamburg.de .. http://www.link-lab.net
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
