Hi Chris,
I'm not sure if I get your point.
On Thu, 5 May 2016, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> I think it's an interesting topic to discuss, I'm a little worried
> that: "Because the third party said things are 'ok' I'll believe
> things are ok!"
>
> mostly because I don't see a clear method to ensure that 'third party' has:
> 1) up-to-date information
>
Same with RTR cache server.
> 2) my best interest at heart
>
If you peer with a route server, you should establish a trust relation
anyway.
> 3) current/appropriate configuration
>
Same with RTR cache erver.
Cheers
matthias
--
Dr. Matthias Waehlisch
. Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST
. Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
.. mailto:[email protected] .. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl
:. Also: http://inet.haw-hamburg.de .. http://www.link-lab.net
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
