On Sep 14, 2016, at 4:56 AM, Tim Bruijnzeels <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > I understand that this is the opinion of the authors. I still disagree. A > weaker word such as "unwanted" or "anomalous" can also be used - it is less > likely to confuse a reader, and can be equally clarified in the introduction. > > Again, let the chairs note that I cannot support the term "adverse" and take > it from there.
Tim - I have no view on this matter either way, but am seeking clarity on your objection to the term “adverse” in the document - is it with regard to simply the title of the document, or also with regard to the usage of the term in text of the document itself? (the former would represent a minor change, whereas the latter would require more a significant change to resolve.) Thanks, /John p.s. my views alone - not necessarily even worth the electrons used in transport
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
