Matthias,
Hi Steve,
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Stephen Kent wrote:
Tim offered no suggestion for a different term, which is not helpful.
the suggestion was "unwanted".
I reread Tim's message; I don't interpret it as having suggested
"unwanted" as an alternative. What I see is Tim noting that the changes
are unwanted by the INR holder. That's true, but the term evocative,
i.e., it fails to communicate the fact that the changes adversely effect
the INR holder.
I just had a brief look into "Internet Security Glossary, Version 2"
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4949), "corrupted" could be an
alternative but I suppose it's still not light version.
Corruption usually implies an unauthorized change, an integrity
violation. Suppression of an update to the RPKI repository system would
not be accurately characterized as corruption, yet it is one of the
actions we consider.
Steve
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
