Dear siesta community:

I am having trouble to get a SCF calculation converged for a layered composite 
system. Can somebody give me a hand?
    
Our system is "graphene n layers on top of Ni(111) surface". I am using GGA 
pseudopotentials for Ni and C elements. When a simplest SZ basis set is used, 
SCF calculation can converge. However, as it comes to the standard DZP basis 
set, SCF convergence becomes difficult. I don't know what to do to improve it. 

Here is my input file:
===========start of input.fdf================
SystemName         2Ni-2gra 
SystemLabel        2Ni-2gra 
NumberOfAtoms        6
Diag.ParallelOverK   T

PAO.BasisSize   DZ 

NumberOfSpecies      2
%block ChemicalSpeciesLabel
    1  28   Ni
    2   6   C
%endblock ChemicalSpeciesLabel

LatticeConstant  2.48901587  Ang

%block LatticeVectors
  0.866025404  -0.500000     0.00000000
  0.866025404   0.500000     0.00000000
  0.000000000   0.000000    12.05295650
%endblock LatticeVectors

%block kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack
  6  0  0   0.0
  0  6  0   0.0
  0  0  1   0.0
%endblock kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack

SpinPolarized   .false.
XC_functional  GGA
XC_authors     PBE

%block PS.lmax
   C   2
%endblock PS.lmax

PAO.EnergyShift   50. meV

MeshCutoff        200. Ry
DM.UseSaveDM      F 
MaxSCFiterations  200
DM.MixingWeight   0.10
DM.NumberPulay    3
DM.Tolerance      0.0001

MD.NumCGsteps  100
MD.TypeOfRun   CG
MD.UseSaveXV   T
MD.UseSaveCG   F
WriteMDXmol    F
WriteForces    T

SaveDeltaRho   F
SaveRho        F

%block GeometryConstraints
  position from 1 to 1
%endblock GeometryConstraints

AtomicCoordinatesFormat Ang
%block AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies
   1.15470054    0.000      1.6256505400   1 #Ni
   1.73205081    0.000      2.4336003900   1 #Ni
   1.73205081    0.000      3.2861461800   2 #C
   2.30940108    0.000      3.2861461800   2 #C
   2.30940108    0.000      4.6320596600   2 #C
   2.88675135    0.000      4.6320596600   2 #C
%endblock AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies   
===========end of input.fdf================


Here is part of my output file:
===========start of output.fdf================
.....
siesta: iscf   Eharris(eV)      E_KS(eV)   FreeEng(eV)   dDmax  Ef(eV)
siesta:    1    -2512.1635    -2522.5031    -2522.5031  5.9203 -7.3552
timer: Routine,Calls,Time,% = IterSCF        1     133.954  82.97
elaps: Routine,Calls,Wall,% = IterSCF        1      11.239  82.68
siesta:    2    -2798.2370    -2503.2791    -2503.2853 15.2607  0.1093
siesta:    3    -2514.2022    -2519.9057    -2519.9121  6.0595 -7.7756
siesta:    4    -2513.5115    -2516.6410    -2516.6423  7.7241 -3.7334
siesta:    5    -2598.9529    -2517.6669    -2517.6798  5.9405 -1.3577
siesta:    6    -2541.5296    -2518.7682    -2518.7715  8.9084 -1.1456
siesta:    7    -2604.5084    -2510.6025    -2510.6047150.0320 -0.4481
siesta:    8    -3121.8587    -2483.1835    -2483.1859598.3458  1.7518
siesta:    9    -2977.9663    -2491.9150    -2491.9182596.9323  4.0476
siesta:   10    -3078.4553    -2498.1912    -2498.1984 62.3984  0.6857
siesta:   11    -4356.4281    -2361.6155    -2361.6199609.8885-39.3225
siesta:   12    -4489.7671    -2325.6771    -2325.6775599.9060-47.2102
siesta:   13    -4360.2034    -2338.9801    -2338.9801600.4145-43.2638
siesta:   14    -3448.0593    -2205.6430    -2205.6430 71.0008-56.8998
siesta:   15    -2579.5160    -2300.5191    -2300.5276 65.1504-24.0299
siesta:   16    -2525.8003    -2327.3343    -2327.3529 82.7621-16.0542
siesta:   17    -2555.9318    -2346.6249    -2346.6364 48.8877-15.5471
siesta:   18    -3513.9083    -2395.8520    -2395.8576 54.9869-12.0970
......
===========end of output.fdf================

Any suggestion is appreciated. Thanks alot!
     
Best wishes!
    
HHG     






--
Magnetism and Magnetic Materials Division
Shenyang Materials Science National Laboratory
Institute of Metal Research 
Chinese Academy of Sciences
72 Wenhua Road,Shenyang 110016, China


+86-15140243901 (mobile)
work:     [email protected]




Responder a