Hello,

noone of the developers is interested in such a fundamental issue? It may 
be a bug...

RG


On Mon 07 Mar 2011, you wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I repeated the calculation using a 2x2x2 grid (input file attached). The
> result is the same. This is not surprising, since the problem is not
> related, in my opinion, to the calculation accuracy (also, the
> calculation at the gamma point should be reasonable for an amorphous
> system).
> 
> I verified that the Fermi energy lies inside the gap (bands attached).
> 
> The epsimg is larger than zero at E<Egap. That's not possible.
> 
> 
> Roberto
> 
> In date 5/3/11 23:52:32, Alexander Vozny wrote:
> > Roberto,
> > are you sure your Fermi level is in the gap?
> > If yes, then I would agree with Karim that most likely your k-grid for
> > DOS is different from k-grid for optical calculation.
> > Alexander.
> 
> In date 4/3/11 18:40:44, karim rezouali wrote:
> > Roberto,
> > 
> > The band structure appears not to be totally correct. Seeing your
> > input file systlab.fdf, I realized that this curve is obtained under
> > the gamma point.approximation
> > 
> > Try to sample the Brillouin zone as follows:
> > %block kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack
> > 2  0  0   0.0
> > 0  2  0   0.0
> > 0  0  2   0.0
> > %endblock kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack
> > 
> > 
> > Optical calculations:
> > 
> > %block Optical.Mesh
> > 
> >  2  2  2
> > 
> > %endblock Optical.Mesh
> > 
> > These changes will make the calculation slightly heavier but that's
> > the price to pay for something more accurate.

Responder a