> You bring up a very important concern above. It is certainly not the > intent of this proposal to create an unreasonable burden on APNIC. It > is difficult however for the membership as a whole to ascertain this > burden is in fact unreasonable without being authorised to view any > information around the costs associated with its implementation.
ripe ncc did this analysis and is providing a path for PI and legacy holders to use certification services. > If this cost is $100 per record then as you say, this could open APNIC > up to a cost of $4,600,000. this is based on the hypothesis that every asn in internet is gonna use 1.2.3.0/24? while i agree that the level of stupidity on the internet is disturbingly high, even i doubt it is that high. fwiw, i appose prop-110 for the leakage issues. and there will be leakage issues. randy * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
