Good morning Masato. After consideration the co-authors feel that RPKI is an unnecessary addition and reference to it as a requirement will be removed in a subsequent draft.
It is essential that any barrier to entry or perception of exclusivity or licensing for the use of this prefix be removed. Regards Dean On Thursday, February 6, 2014, Masato Yamanishi <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear SIG members, > > Can you go back to original point which is whether the RPKI section is > needed for prop-110 or not? > IMO, it is quite important point to consider this proposal. > > Also, please note that APNIC policy SIG is not a place to debate between > regions. > > Rgs, > Masato (Matt) Yamanishi > > > > > On 14/02/04 16:16, "Randy Bush" <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >> I did not intend the normative SHOULD that you are implying, if you > >> prefer s/should/"MAY WISH TO" and see RFC 6919. > > > >actually, i suggest the manner i deal with the arin policy, i do not > >post to the list, period. [ and, my $dayjob is in the arin region. ] > > > >the world was tired of americans telling everyone else what to do even > >before snowden. > > > >randy > >* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > > * > >_______________________________________________ > >sig-policy mailing list > >[email protected] <javascript:;> > >http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > -- -- Dean Pemberton Technical Policy Advisor InternetNZ +64 21 920 363 (mob) [email protected] To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
