> I understand the cost issues involved. However, the RPKI ROAs and the > registration of the non-exclusive users of the prefix is what > distinguished this from a special-purpose allocation that needs IETF > Review to be made. If you remove that part of the proposal then you > should include how you intend to proceed on the issue of IETF Review, > or clarify how this is not a special-purpose allocation that needs > IETF Review.
always good to have folk from outside the region telling everyone what they SHOULD do. randy * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
