-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2/25/15 11:10 PM, David Farmer wrote:

> A network of 1 or 2 routers probably doesn't justify an ASN unless
> it is multi-homed or connected to an IX.  A network of 100 routers
> probably justifies an ASN regardless.  Then the question becomes,
> where to draw the line.

even more slippery slope. eg. AS 29216 has a single upstream, with
just 2 prefixes (one v4, one v6).  and they have a legitimate need, so
size is irrelevant.

- -gaurab

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAlTvNvoACgkQSo7fU26F3X10YACgtvvwLsn/IBjwM0hzZyw5gry9
tV0AoMjytMyN2Mgwm6Qr0m1DUE1GS5zo
=uwQr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to