On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 03:08:42PM +0000, Gaurab Raj Upadhaya wrote: > On 2/25/15 11:10 PM, David Farmer wrote: > > > A network of 1 or 2 routers probably doesn't justify an ASN unless > > it is multi-homed or connected to an IX. A network of 100 routers > > probably justifies an ASN regardless. Then the question becomes, > > where to draw the line. > > even more slippery slope. eg. AS 29216 has a single upstream, with > just 2 prefixes (one v4, one v6). and they have a legitimate need, so > size is irrelevant.
I agree with Gaurab, attempting to pinpoint where to draw the line in this context is not worth the effort. Talking about 'size', assumes networks can be classified by quantitative metrics. * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
