In addition, to clariry, I didn't mean making APRICOT and Policy SIG sessions parallel, but sequential on the same day(s). For example, when operators finish a APOPS session, they can join the Policy session in the next time spot; and when finish the Policy session, they can join another APOPS session.
Jessica Shen > -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: "Owen DeLong" <o...@delong.com> > 发送时间: 2015-02-28 05:33:59 (星期六) > 收件人: "Shen Zhi" <shen...@cnnic.cn> > 抄送: "Mark Tinka" <mark.ti...@seacom.mu>, sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > 主题: Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal] prop-114: Modification in the ASN > eligibility criteria > > > > On Feb 26, 2015, at 22:16 , Shen Zhi <shen...@cnnic.cn> wrote: > > > > Good point, getting greater operator participation in the policy processes > > is > > important. APRICOT and APNIC having joint meeting is one of the good > > ways to bring more operators to APNIC policy discussion. I noticed on the > > Policy SIG session @APNIC 39, there will be some short background > > instroductions > > by APNIC staff (could be someone from the community who is familiar with > > the > > policy history in future) before the proposal discussion, I think it's a > > very good > > way to faciliate the new comers to understand and join the discussion. > > > > I'm thinking if we set part of or whole Policy SIG session on the same days > > when APRICOT or APCERT sessions are running, say Tuesday, or Wednesday, > > will > > it help that more operators attend the policy discussions? > > That depends. If it’s a parallel track to something operators would consider > more interesting, > then probably not. > > If it’s _THE_ track at that time, then it might work, or, it might turn into > shopping time, etc. > > As near as I can tell, the problem is less one of accessibility than interest. > > Owen > > > > > > > Cheers, > > Jessica Shen > > > > > > > >> -----邮件原件----- > >> 发件人: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net > >> [mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net] 代表 Owen DeLong > >> 发送时间: 2015年2月27日 4:42 > >> 收件人: Mark Tinka > >> 抄送: sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > >> 主题: Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal] prop-114: Modification in the > >> ASN eligibility criteria > >> > >> In theory, this is why each RIR has a public policy process open to any who > >> choose to participate. > >> > >> The fact that operator participation in the process is limited > >> (voluntarily by > >> the operators themselves) continues to cause problems for operators. This > >> not only affects RIRs, but also the IETF, ICANN, and other > >> multi-stakeholder > >> fora covering various aspects of internet governance and development. > >> > >> If you have a suggestion for getting greater operator participation in > >> these > >> processes, I’m all ears. > >> > >> Owen > >> > >>> On Feb 25, 2015, at 5:27 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> While I tend to agree that the current draft policy in its form needs > >>> more work, I empathize with the long-held concern of detachment > >>> between the RIR and network operations. This is a well-documented > >>> issue that affects several other policies within various RIR > >>> communities, and not just this one nor APNIC. Take assigned prefix > >>> length and what operators filter against as an example. > >>> > >>> Globally, perhaps we would do well to find way to make RIR operations > >>> and policy design reflect the practical day-to-day changes taking > >>> place within operator networks, or at the very least, make a provision > >>> for them that sufficiently covers what the future may throw up. > >>> > >>> I don't think any of us have the answers now, but it starts from > >> somewhere. > >>> > >>> Mark. > >>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > >> * > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> sig-policy mailing list > >>> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > >>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > >> > >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > >> * > >> _______________________________________________ > >> sig-policy mailing list > >> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
