On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <[email protected]> wrote:
> "have allocated provider independent address space by > APNIC, AND intend to multi-home in the future" > > the 'previous' term is confusing. kind of implies that it doesn't need > to be current allocation (so in theory returned/re-claimed space users > could qualify - though that is not the intention). > It is not just confusing, it is explicitly different. Aftab, Skeeve, is the "previous" use-case intended? -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
