I do agree... I think we will change it to 'current'
...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service [email protected] ; www.v4now.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Sanjeev Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> "have allocated provider independent address space by >> APNIC, AND intend to multi-home in the future" >> >> the 'previous' term is confusing. kind of implies that it doesn't need >> to be current allocation (so in theory returned/re-claimed space users >> could qualify - though that is not the intention). >> > > It is not just confusing, it is explicitly different. > > Aftab, Skeeve, is the "previous" use-case intended? > > -- > Sanjeev Gupta > +65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
