-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 if status is allocated, it is current.
so, just remove the 'previous' - -gaurab On 3/6/15 1:09 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote: > I do agree... I think we will change it to 'current' > > > ...Skeeve > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Sanjeev Gupta <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Gaurab Raj Upadhaya > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > "have allocated provider independent address space by APNIC, AND > intend to multi-home in the future" > > the 'previous' term is confusing. kind of implies that it doesn't > need to be current allocation (so in theory returned/re-claimed > space users could qualify - though that is not the intention). > > > It is not just confusing, it is explicitly different. > > Aftab, Skeeve, is the "previous" use-case intended? > > -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * _______________________________________________ sig-policy > mailing list [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * _______________________________________________ sig-policy > mailing list [email protected] > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > - -- http://www.gaurab.org.np/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlT4/s4ACgkQSo7fU26F3X182gCg70G0RByisCjt2HXiLFOWHhgb h10AoKTcPiw9v/wgmlq7EC/4kLdcWPNk =jWUW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
