Hi On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Skeeve Stevens <[email protected]> wrote:
> Masato, > > I don't care if you are the Chair or not. Do not use your position to > accuse someone of personally attacking someone when they are not. If you > were being a fair Char, then I'd also expect you to deal with your friend > Randys passive aggressive insinuations - which you never do, so just back > off. > I don't care about history here, but everybody understand you just made an public personal attack on me, I think that is clear. > > I suggest you go research Lu's posts on ARIN and Ripe over the last year > and you will see the antagonistic approach he uses to turn lists into > battles, including attacking the Chair when he doesn't agree with them. Is > this what you want to happily let him do to APNIC lists? > I have never turned any list into battles ever, and you are trying to siding with people you like and trying turn this list into political war ground as everybody witness here. What I said and what I did, is public achieved in both ARIN and RIPE mailing list, and both are not for you to make your personal judgment here in Apnic policy discussion mailing list. I have never *attacked* Chair in anyway but barely defended myself and my company in the list, and you are making another personal accusation here without ground. And everybody here can tell all I posted in this list was an policy question to the community, I believe no one here would agree with any of your accusation. > I for one thank Owen for informing us that Lu was trying to start the > same/similar arguments on this list has he has done on other RIR lists. I > hardly think we need to rehash the same debates unless they are particular > reference to APNIC and its policy. > Read my last Email I was not hiding in anyway about asking the policy question, so you don't need thank him for something I made public myself. And to what argument you are referring to that I am trying to start with? the policy question I posted receive generally same answer cross the globe, there is no argument if you bother to read before making conclusion. I believe what you are trying to start here is not help in anyway for the policy discussion and I hope it can be stopped and so people really want to discuss policy can continue. > > ...Skeeve > > *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* > *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service > [email protected] ; www.v4now.com > > Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve > > facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> > linkedin.com/in/skeeve > > twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com ; Keybase: > https://keybase.io/skeeve > > > IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Masato Yamanishi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Skeeve, >> >> As the Chair, let me warn you that calling somebody "trouble maker" on >> the list is a personal attack and it conflicts with APNIC Code of Conduct >> as shown in below. >> >> <https://www.apnic.net/community/participate/mailinglists/code-of-conduct >> > >> >> Masato@iPhone >> >> >> On Dec 6, 2015, at 20:22, Skeeve Stevens <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Says another trouble maker :) >> >> >> ...Skeeve >> >> *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* >> *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service >> [email protected] ; www.v4now.com >> >> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve >> >> facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> >> linkedin.com/in/skeeve >> >> twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com ; Keybase: >> https://keybase.io/skeeve >> >> >> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers >> >> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > you seem like a trouble maker. >>> >>> ad homina are not appropriate >>> >>> randy >>> >> >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >> * >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >> >> > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > -- -- Kind regards. Lu
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
