Assigned address space isn’t generally delegated to LIRs,… It’s generally delegated to end-users. Address space delegated to LIRs may then be reassigned by the LIR to itself for internal purposes.
Unless there’s a case where an LIR is receiving an assignment instead of an allocation, I think we can limit it to space that is delegated to an end-user by the RIR. Owen > On Feb 20, 2020, at 20:20 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Thanks Bertrand, > > I’m fine as well with this option. Repeating it here: > > "Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or > end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the > infrastructure they operate and may not be sub-assigned". > > Could the secretariat let us know if they still believe there is any text > that is "unnecessarily duplicated" or if they could live with that? > > Note that it seems that emails using DMARC still get wrong to the mailing > list. It will be very important that the secretariat resolves that, > otherwise, some participants are not getting emails from some of us > (including me). So, no wonder that they don’t respond! > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > > El 21/2/20 15:14, "Bertrand Cherrier" > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> en nombre de > mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> escribió: > > Hello everyone, > Thank you Jordi for this revised prop. > How about this : > > Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or > end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the > infrastructure they operate and may not be sub-assigned. > > It would be nice to have inputs from other members of the Policy SIG, > especially from those who opposed this proposal. > Regards, > Cordialement, > > Bertrand Cherrier > Administration Systèmes - R&D > Micro Logic Systems > mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.mls.nc > Tél : +687 24 99 24 > VoIP : 65 24 99 24 > SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min) > > On 21 Feb 2020, at 11:09, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Hi all, > > As you know, we have decided to continue the discussion of this proposal in > the mailing list. > > I've been thinking in a possible way to keep the "documented purposes" text > as some indicated in the mike. > > So, what do you feel about these two choices: > > Option a) > 2.2.3. Assigned address space > Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or > end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the > infrastructure they operate. > > Option b) > 2.2.3. Assigned address space > Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or > end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the > infrastructure they operate and may not be sub-assigned to other networks. > > My personal preference, and following the staff analysis in v2, will be > option a, but just in case the community prefers to re-state "and may not be > sub-assigned to other networks" (I believe, and also according to the staff > inputs that "exclusive" is already indicating it). > > Just as a reminder, the actual proposal (v2) is at: > https://www.apnic.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/prop-133-v002.txt > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the > individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, > copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if > partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be > considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the > original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * > _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com <http://www.theipv6company.com/> > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the > individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, > copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if > partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be > considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the > original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
