Hi Jordi, On 21/02/2020 3:20 pm, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Thanks Bertrand, > > I’m fine as well with this option. Repeating it here: > > "Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or > end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the > infrastructure they operate and may not be sub-assigned". > > Could the secretariat let us know if they still believe there is any text > that is "unnecessarily duplicated" or if they could live with that?
As reported at APNIC 49 Policy SIG, Secretariat do not have any issues with the current policy text nor the proposed text in version 2 of prop-133. Secretariat impact assessment comments for any new versions of this proposal will be shared with the community after the proposal is formally submitted to the Policy SIG Chairs. > > Note that it seems that emails using DMARC still get wrong to the mailing > list. It will be very important that the secretariat resolves that, > otherwise, some participants are not getting emails from some of us > (including me). So, no wonder that they don’t respond! Thanks for reporting this issue. Secretariat is looking into it and will provide an update soon. Regards Sunny > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > > El 21/2/20 15:14, "Bertrand Cherrier" > <mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net en nombre de > mailto:b.cherr...@micrologic.nc> escribió: > > Hello everyone, > Thank you Jordi for this revised prop. > How about this : > > Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or > end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the > infrastructure they operate and may not be sub-assigned. > > It would be nice to have inputs from other members of the Policy SIG, > especially from those who opposed this proposal. > Regards, > Cordialement, > > Bertrand Cherrier > Administration Systèmes - R&D > Micro Logic Systems > mailto:b.cherr...@micrologic.nc > https://www.mls.nc > Tél : +687 24 99 24 > VoIP : 65 24 99 24 > SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min) > > On 21 Feb 2020, at 11:09, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Hi all, > > As you know, we have decided to continue the discussion of this proposal in > the mailing list. > > I've been thinking in a possible way to keep the "documented purposes" text > as some indicated in the mike. > > So, what do you feel about these two choices: > > Option a) > 2.2.3. Assigned address space > Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or > end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the > infrastructure they operate. > > Option b) > 2.2.3. Assigned address space > Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or > end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the > infrastructure they operate and may not be sub-assigned to other networks. > > My personal preference, and following the staff analysis in v2, will be > option a, but just in case the community prefers to re-state "and may not be > sub-assigned to other networks" (I believe, and also according to the staff > inputs that "exclusive" is already indicating it). > > Just as a reminder, the actual proposal (v2) is at: > https://www.apnic.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/prop-133-v002.txt > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the > individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, > copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if > partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be > considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the > original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * > _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the > individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, > copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if > partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be > considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the > original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
