Hello Jordi,

On 22/02/2020 2:20 pm, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After my previous response to Owen, I can't find anymore any the text in the 
> actual policy (neither guidelines)  about assignments. So, I'm wondering if I 
> was wrong, or it has been removed at some point and I don't recall it ... 
> Could the secretariat point out to the specific text about that? If it has 
> been removed, clearly there is a need to further update section 2.2.3 to 
> remove that reference and avoid the mismatch.

You mean section 2.2.3 text? It is not removed. You can find it in the 
current policy manual here

https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/resources#2.2.3.-Assigned-address-space


> 
> One more request for the secretariat. Could you please provide stats on the 
> number of ISP (not end-users) assignments, for example in the last 12-15 
> years, in order to understand if this is a real requirement?

Noted! Secretariat will provide the stats soon.

Regards
Sunny

> 
> Anyone can provide examples of why an ISP could need and assignment instead 
> of using their own allocation?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> @jordipalet
>   
>   
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
> individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
> considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
> prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
> original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
> 
> 
> 
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           
> *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> 
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to