if you dont want to run some *nix variant (linux, *bsd, commercial unix (??) or other things ive never heard of), then you might be stuck with win2k and demands for higher end hardware. i think my point is this: if you want good performance on economical hardware, dont use windows; what will work best will require reading, learning, and effort, and will probably entail something that tastes like *nix
;) Michael C. Wu wrote: > on 10/01/2001 10:29 PM, Daniel Brown at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>if you dont want to run linux, then you are stuck with win2k server and >>demands for a fast pc >> > > There are other OS'es too. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
