On 02/15/2013 02:51 AM, R. Diez wrote: > > However, it seems that Joel got the message fine. Joel got it because he was a direct recipient (not through the ML): > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> I didn't want to invest time trying to understand what that "This block will > automatically be lifted shortly" meant. > > You could have asked to see the patch though. > I shouldn't have to. You arrogantly asked Peter if he had seen a patch you failed to make available. Making sure the patch gets where it needs to is your responsibility. > Besides, Joel uploaded it pretty quickly to a public bug tracker And I'm supposed to keep track of _your_ patch, when _you_ want me to review it? > > You are not really an easy-going, encouraging team in this project, are you? > Hell no. We're a highly fragmented, oligarchic community. It's next to impossible for a _new_ and willing contributor to do anything useful, no matter what his or her level of enthusiasm or experience is. Expect to be treated with complete disrespect. Expect to be told your work is shit and be given no reason for it. Expect your work to be completely ignored. I know because I deal with this bullshit everyday. Welcome to the club. Luckily, Joel doesn't do any of the above, so if you restrict your contributions to PulseView, you'll be fine. Alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel - in partnership with Geeknet, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials, tech docs, whitepapers, evaluation guides, and opinion stories. Check out the most recent posts - join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ sigrok-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
