On Tue September 5 2006 8:43 pm, Ramakrishnan Sundaram wrote: > On 9/5/06, sastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I may have missed some earlier posts, but has anyone on this list been > _blindly critical_ of anything, ever?
Where did I say that anyone on this list has been blindly critical of something? > other crime. The reason Udhay (and I) felt you were trolling is > because you ignore the rich and the politically connected evading the > law, and focus on the religious leaders doing so. Where have I done that? I suspect that you are confusing offline statements I have made with what I have said on this list. >Blinkers, Shiv. On the one hand you say that you may have missed a lot of posts, and on the other hand you assert that I have said something that I have not said. Maybe I should take a few lines out of Udhay's needlessly harsh "trolling" post addressed to me and throw them at you: > 1. Rhetorical tactics that are more appropriate to a smear campaign - > 2. Unsupported assertions > 3. Implicit assumptions that also turn out to have no evidence > presented for them (also known as "smuggling in the desired answer as > part of the question") and > 5. Strawman arguments You don't suppose you might yourself be trolling do you? shiv
