Ramakrishnan Sundaram wrote: > > Is it really possible that Indian TV broadcast someone "confessing" > under "truth serum", or as they called it, "narco-"something? > > Isn't this illegal and anyway not admissible in court? >
So far, scopolamine / its more recent variants, and lie detector tests (which the locals keep calling "brain mapping") do seem to be admissible as evidence.
