>For the worst jargon, one only has to read reviews of art
>exhibitions..

aah..
deepa, please share urls :)
where can i read the "patina of incredibiliousness"?

On 9/5/07, Deepa Mohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jargon...I think the definition of "jargon" in its negative sense (no,
> I haven't googled the Wiki, this is my personal opinion) is.....
> high-falutin' words used to impress and intimidate the listener with
> the user's familiarity with a subject, when the same thing can be
> expressed in simpler terms....for example on the recent thread on
> "rodents" or other technical  threads, I don't think you are all using
> jargon because those terms ARE perfectly comprehensible to all of you,
> and you are not out to impress anyone else.
>
> For the worst jargon, one only has to read reviews of art
> exhibitions...even music reviews are sometimes not free of it. I
> recently read about the "patina of incredibiliousness" in someone's
> work, I kid you not. No, neither the artist nor the reviewer suffered
> bad digestion..but I certainly found that word very hard to stomach.
>
>
>
> Deepa.
>
> On 9/5/07, Amit Varma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I only have an issue with jargon if it's meaningless. 'Vengefully
> > consumerist' is just that, on multiple levels.
> >
> > Mob violence can have various reasons, and to ascribe any one would be
> > simplistic. I'm invoking the failure of the rule of law to explain why mobs
> > get a greater license in India to do their thing.
> >
> > On 9/5/07, Gautam John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 9/5/07, ashok _ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well.... even "failure of rule of law" sounds like jargon to me... the
> > >
> > > Jargon is terminology, is it not? And the use of jargon doesn't
> > > devalue the context, per se. It only pre-supposes a familiarity with
> > > the subject.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Amit Varma
> > http://www.indiauncut.com
> >
>
>


-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
does the frog know it has a latin name?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Reply via email to