On Dec 18, 2007 10:54 AM, Chandrachoodan Gopalakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Having said that, I do know it is difficult getting a decent panorama. I've > tried a hundred times, and only managed to get 1 or 2 which I liked.
Really? I can't imagine it being so with the new generation of digital cameras some of which even come with a pano mode. I've had pretty decent success with these cameras even when shooting without a tripod. Perhaps you refer to the film variants? And, yeah, I thought the photo lost it too - only partly due to the fault of the photographer. The Mumbai skyline's smog overshadows the flamingos. There were many elements in the picture, each of which could have made a nice subject all by itself, but together it seems to lose all voice. Really a more picturesque location and a tighter crop that highlights the subject matter would have made it more appealing to me. Art is subjective, so I won't apologize for being subjective. Cheeni
