On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 04:16:40PM +1100, Charles Haynes wrote: > I can understand why you say that, and I'm not going to try to > convince you otherwise. Still, having been at a lot of big (and small) > public companies (DEC, Apple, Xerox) and now at Google for a while I > can say that while I agree with you in general, I disagree with you in
Does this mean the subpoenas go over your desk, and you're privy to all aspects of internal network infrastructure, including TLA tapping points? Including those off the premises? Wow, never thought such people would have the time to post on silk. > the specific case of Google. That may well change over time as Google > gets bigger. The idealism may get diluted or even lost, but at least No conditionals about it. > for now *I* feel that Google is trying to not be evil, even sometimes > to the detriment of short term profits. That's not nearly good enough. I'm surprised and offended you seem to think such assertions carry any weight. "I am not a crook". -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
