OK IG here is my answer ( I presume this is the one that you meant) On Wednesday 20 May 2009 9:38:03 am Bonobashi wrote: > But based on what I have produced as evidence on my stand on the subject, > you have a perfect right to arraign me on that count. The question is, and > I leave it to you, having 'framed charges', so to speak, would you then > allow me the right to plead? If you do, then I intend to indicate very > clearly what my examples were (hint: they were examples), and my stand on > the cut-off line.
Franky I am inclined to let the matter drop for purely selfish reasons. Anything anyone says will tempt me to make long winded responses and maybe there are other things people want to do and and other things that I ought to be doing - like getting down to reading 4 books that I bought as part of "redeeming Citibank reward points" (and 3 others bought before that) I was just having a ball experimenting with the concept of "If you (not you personally) think I am North pole I will show how you can never be neutral, but represent South pole" In fact - I am tempted to get verbose again - i believe that this concept is exactly the one that has led to the very visible failure of "Hindutva" as a driving force in the last election. A very likely outcome if you start believing that you are always North pole and the other is always South pole., so to speak. To me the real mystery state is Karnataka. shiv
