Hi Simmi

Your Yahoo address is not verified - whatever that means.

That seems to be setting off Gmail spam filters.

See screenshot attached

On 03-Aug-2016 4:56 PM, "Simmi Sareen" <simmi_sar...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
>     On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 11:42 AM, Rajesh Mehar <
> rajeshme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would like everyone's thoughts on these two links below, and the idea
> that without net energy consumption reduction (through de-industrialization
> and reduction of automation, probably Luddite ideas in a group such as
> Silk) there is no long term benefit from switching to so-called-renewables.
>
> How Sustainable is Solar Power?
>
> http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2015/04/how-sustainable-is-pv-solar-power.html#more
>
> It's certainly true that a dynamic lifecycle analysis of solar PV carbon
> footprint would look much worse today than it did in 2008. But I believe
> things are set to get better from here. If we look at the two sided
> equation (carbon cost of manufacturing and shipping panels and returns from
> deploying these panels), the first is permanently altered. There is no way
> manufacturing can move away from low cost Taiwanese and Korean players.
> However, deployment patterns will see a massive shift with more than 50% of
> capacity additions from now to 2025 coming from China and India.
> It is also a tad over-simplistic to position solar only as a replacement
> for grid connected thermal power. No matter how fast the capacity addition
> or how low the panel cost, high solar storage costs will ensure that solar
> and conventional power continues to co-exist for a very long time.
> Solar has also proven to be a accretive solution. Take, for instance, the
> 60 million Indian households with no access to electricity. Conventional
> grid is too expensive to build here, micro wind and biogas have both been
> ineffective so  solar micro-grids are the only way these villagers are
> going to get lights, fans and mobile chargers. If a slightly higher carbon
> footprint but a significantly lower cost from Chinese manufacturers makes
> this solution possible, it's a huge benefit.
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to