I'm afraid I cannot answer you because the language you are using isn't close enough to how I express myself for me to be able to either feel confident in what you're asking, or to know how to phrase a response that would communicate my intent in a way that would successfully convey that intent to you.
Sorry. -- Charles On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 at 22:47 Vasanth Kamath <vasanthmkama...@gmail.com> wrote: > I had asked. - "Searching in google is a result of prior synapse - > true or false ?” > > > The word google was intentionally inserted to make it sound more real. > In the backdrop of a simulated world, I believe that there is > significant influence of cues coming from multiple external dimensions > on what one searches for vs a sense of discovery..so I wanted to seek > thoughts from this group if one could “search” without bias or without > any sort of prior conditioninng > > So, > > You often search when you know what you want to search.. > How do you know what you want? How was it conditioned ? > how does one perfect the art of searching? Or better conditioning? > Is it better search terms? OR > Is it to know better what you want? OR > Is it to know various methods of searching and retrieval? > > > Is it possible to search without Without any precincts of “conditioning” > In other words how we do we know this is what we were searching for? > Without having any “models” or “features” of what to search > What are the ways to formulate unique new search terms ? > What are the ways to discover anything for that matter (independently)? > > > Consider these facts… > > "Each keyword or phrase needs to mirror the language used by your > target consumer. If you understand how consumers are finding > businesses like yours, you will begin to see increased visits to your > website as your copy will match search queries” > > A dog can spot a bomb only when its trained to (it knows the model) > > A team of researchers gave eight of the cats meals of beef treated > with the deworming agent thiabendazole in doses large enough to make > them temporarily sick to their stomachs. “It basically causes a bad > case of indigestion,” WildiZe founder Eli Weiss told The Aspen Times. > After a few meals of treated beef, the lions were once again offered > untreated meat. Seven of the eight refused to eat it, while an eighth > actually refused to eat at all for a short period. > ..... > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 6:30 AM, Udhay Shankar N <ud...@pobox.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Vasanth Kamath < > vasanthmkama...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Id be glad to rephrase the question > >> > > > > That would be a good idea. Provide some context as well, so people can > > decide whether it's something that interests them. > > > > Udhay > > > > -- > Regards, > Vasanth > >
