Greetings to the List! and
Hi Mike! Nice bit of "preaching" Brother, if I do say so myself!! :) I agree, in that we do have to consider credible testimony. Sorting out the credible from the incredible, is another part of it, as we have seen. We are constantly bombarded with research findings of all kinds (and from professionals in their fields) that is often contradictory or incomplete. Then there is the information that is commercially biased, and is instead misinformation. We even have data that proves to be nothing more than establishment propaganda. It is not always an easy task and it can confuse the issue, which is the purpose of some of this "data". The Bible says "Try all things, cleave to that which is good." I think this applies here as well as theologically. We should try these things by that which we know is true, and hold to that which proves itself faithful. That is what we have been doing all along. No? I have to fight the tendency to become so well entrneched that I become unable to move to a better position. I am experimenting with the AC, not because the DC method does not serve us well, but with the hope of the possibility that we may be served even better (or at least as well) with a yet less complicated method. I am running tests too, Mike, and you are right, we do need these to establish the method scientifically. I am sure you will also agree that personal testimony is evidence acceptable in any courtroom in this land. Therefore, we should give it equal creedence, should we not. (When from credible witnesses, and consistent with that which has been testified to before.) "Let everything be established by two or three witnesses." A dear friend out west has been getting cancer patients to use his AC generated CS. The physicians' reports are reamarkable, and some are in total remission in just 6 weeks. These are documented lab reports, and the people are ecstatic. The doctors are actually cooperating in some cases. It is a different sort of place in Oregon, I suspect. This is part of the reason I am interested in this AC method. The other part is the ovbious lack of a need to filter large particles from the solution. I believe we need to hold to that which we have found, and still keep an open mind that there may be a yet better way. As you know I am an advocate of the DC method, to some "ad nauseum". :) I also know that to make a large quantity of this colloid through a method that concentrates the solution, I am also creating particles above the colloidal range (and only able to filter a portion of the larger of these out of solution). I can take the size down to .1 micron with the methods I use. Even if I used a .02 micron filter, this would still leave particles far above the colloidal range. The solutions I am producing require filtration to keep the solution clear of larger particles. I would like to keep the particle size below the necessity for filtration at all. I would like a uniformity of particle size well within the colloidal range. I am anticipating this is possible, and with a low tech setup, that is very inexpensive. This would be the best case scenario, from my standpoint. I do not mean to cause stress for those of us who are concerned with the effectiveness of our DC generated solutions, clear, gold, yellow, or otherwise. These also produce a safe colloidal solution, which we have all been using for years without any harmful effect. Many have had wonderful results, even cures have been reported for many things that are currently baffling modern medicine. Stick with a winner! There is also the old saying "Never change horses in the middle of the stream!".....I am still on my horse and not switching to a better one till the other shore, on solid ground!! Amen! I am not advocating neglecting the DC method in any way! I believe we need to be aware of a variety of effective ways to make this wonderful solution. Things may change, who knows, we may be making CS from a bicycle with an alternator attached to the rear wheel. :) I am just doing some footwork with the hope of finding a better way for all of us. If it is true, I will simply thank God for it and share it will everyone I can. If not, I will continue with that which has been proven a good gift from the same source! :) I am not ungrateful, or doubting, just seeking. Just like the time I found how to make the yellow-gold the first time. :) >From Mike's last post: >The redeeming feature of it all is the folks among us who are >successfully treating themselves and regaining their health. *That* >is what we're all here for! > >Thanks, > >Mike Amen! You are preaching to the choir, Brother! :) God Bless, Scott The Holy Bible , Acts 4:12 "Neither is there salvation in any other , for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." Spoken of the Lord Jesus Christ.
