--On 6 September 2007 16:59:08 -0400 Simon Jester <[email protected]> wrote:

I'll agree that no one can be 100% *wholly* objective, but there is a
huge difference (in the degree of objectivity) between:

1. a 'scientist' working for Devlin-McGregor desperately trying to
'prove' that their new drug cures liver disease when it in fact does the
exact opposite, and

2. a back-yard mechanic messing around with electromagnetism, hoping to
stumble on some newfangled form of energy...

Oh yes.
And there's so much that could be said about inductive scientific rationale and theories to explain life and experience. But to keep it short, technology and it's advancement is different kind of knowledge from inductive science and it's interpretation for launching products, particularly medical products and food processing.

I think I'm looking at things differently concerning knowledge and truth because of my background and concerns. I don't think one can explain anything about the body based upon from material biological sciences truthfully. One can identify agents and factors, symptoms. Allopathic medicine can help, and surgery, like lancing an infected wound. Research often tells why traditional foods and medicines, housing, silver etc work for good health, but I don't really see any novel remedies. They appear to exist but are usually short term relief from a condition. Also better alternatives exist. Did you ever see an advert for wet flannels for childrens' fevers? Well this primary nursing is the best way of reducing fever. Breakthroughs in offsetting brain damage following blunt head injuries are cooling the brain. My mother lost a finger two months ago because she was administered anti-biotics instead of having the finger lanced (there is a sheath in the hand, which doesn't exist in the foot and it presents a barrier to pus). When a new infection emerged a week later, again the GP prescribed the strongest antibiotics. I had been furious already. She rang the surgeon who instructed the local nurse to lance it. It promptly got better. Her thumb was saved. You see her immune system had been compromised by antibiotics and by environmental poisons. General Practitioners won't use a scalpel. Yet I and other mountaineers carried one with us, plus a little iodine powder. You can't find it for sale in the UK in local shops.

An example by analogy: We can push start a car to get it running, but it tells us nothing about sparks combustion, heat, energy or gases or solidity. Likewise computer analogies for the brain are only analogies, and so misleading if taken as truth.

I don't mind technology, but it's driven by seeking solutions to problems that don't exist. I see this in the food processing industry and in building technology for the masses. We never really settle into a good life; it creates problems when the problems are falsified.

I trained as a scientist, a linguist and a musician. Later I took an MSc in Natural Resource Management. Fascinating, but it all ends up with conservation of traditional practices as a whole culture as the solutions to serious problems. I wouldn't call it science, simply investigation. Ecophysiological studies and predictive models are sophisticated, but you end up concluding that the traditional societies protected overgrazing or from soil loss, maximised production and diversity within a locality yet protected fragile environments. You see this nowhere more clearly than in fragile mountain environments and desert fringes. And the major problem? Centralised governments, at a distance from the people, disempowered local chiefs/councils, World Bank, Green Revolution, and forces of cultural erosion, like mass tourism. Most important is the mocking of their taboos and rituals, which generally associated with local deities in a system of give and take.

'Science' is a waste of time, to my mind. We haven't got what our grand childern will have: And we are not better off than our Ancestors: Its the myth of material progress.
Greed and materialistic world-views are the problem.

Oh dear, another too long post. Sorry. Forgive me.

John.


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]

Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>