Possibly so, but that's a diferent subject with a whole different set of
approaches.
"Autism" is one thing with a cause and maybe many triggers, toxic damage
is another much more direct bugaboo.
But it has been proven that the *amount* of toxins in a vaccine doesn't do
anything to trigger Autism as eliminating them did not affect the rates one
little bit.
Eliminating the toxins is still not a bad idea, but for other
reasons...but CAN they be eliminated to an affect with environmental load
being many times that of what may be in a vaccine.
If you turn off your flashlight while standing under a flood light, sure,
it'll save some power and if you don't need it for something else, why
not?..... but it's still pretty darned bright in that place.
This would be interesting, if true. But, yes it does seem like we people
like to hang our hats on something anything, to give us direction, purpose
and make our life seem more meaningful. <sigh> But it is clear that
there is a huge increase in autism and many other neurological symptoms
that are probably due to toxic insults.
I do think parents have to have some common sense and really look at what
they *want* for their children. No child should have ANY vaccine of any
kind when that child has a fever, or even a little cold. And as for giving
a whole slew of them at once, that is because the experts expect that the
poorer parents, and the parents who do not want to be bothered, will only
show up for one appt, instead of a half dozen, which is the way it used to
be done. The decisions made in the so called interest of Public Health
have been shown in my experience to be contrary to the interest of my
children. One must stand up for themselves these days, and refuse to cede
their authority to someone who may not have their child's best interest at
heart (nearly everyone else besides the parents).
## With judgement comes consequences.
If you feel qualified to judge, then judge, but if you are wrong, there
be consequences same as if someone else does the deciding...but no one to
blame.
There probably IS no "right" way with no two people being the same.
Public Health doesn't have the capacity to make individual
judgments...it's public. Its job is to take up the slack for slackers, but
also can't define them very well..so you stand up and identify
yourself...well done.
Always best to err on the side of caution. [Doesn't mean you'll win, just
increases the odds that you won't lose as much as fast]
No easy answers...no "safe" way.
Virtually everyone gets away with the single visit..some don't.
It would be nice to know before hand who that is and what day to
miss...and that day may be coming.
But pinning a tail on the wrong donkey in a herd of donkeys going
different directions, won't get us there.
..lots of hooves going in circles trampling everything.
Ode
kathryn
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.3.0/1505 - Release Date: 6/16/2008
7:20 AM
