Evening Tel,
>> At 08:05 AM 8/16/2008, you wrote:
The price I saw was $ 35.00 plus shipping and handling.
http://www.wishgranted.com/ec_store/item12.htm
PPM testers do a better job without the guess work using a TDS tester.
Interesting statement. You must not have read much about the meter.
The Hanna information clearly states it measures the TDS.
But goes on to say, it indicates ppm.
>> This is a very accurate meter for colloidal silver PPM testing
This statement from the link, is a bit misleading.
No meter in the world, with a range of 1 to 1999 will have very good
accuracy at 10 percent of the full scale range or less. Especially a
cheap one. A very expensive meter would be better at the lower
limits of the range. Most CS would be a very small percent of the
full scale range.
Don't let the statement of "Resolution of 1 ppm" fool you. That
certainly does not mean accuracy.
>> Calibration Screwdriver and Calibration Solution.
Of course one calibrates an EC meter, which is what the TDS meter
really is, and the ppm meter is
a fraud, nothing more, nothing less. I never heard of calibration of
a ppm meter.
But I have some ideas on that also that may be the best idea
yet. Stand by, it will be later.
It does the calculations internally just like everyone does with the
calculator.
( I have stated this a few times also )
<http://www.wishgranted.com>http://www.wishgranted.com
For a time, I though you posted the wrong link, or did not read it.
That's close anyway. ( the price )
That statement is true.
>> PPM testers do a better job without the guess work using a TDS tester.
I can only deduce that you mean by "guess work", ..... the
calculations that people do using other meters. And the different
"Scale Factors" they use. Seems many exist.
Mathematics is not guess work, in my book.
So, what are you and others, "Guessing At" ?
Seems to me, that any fool, that was going to make a sell a meter,
mistakenly call it a ppm meter, and sell it for the purpose of using
it for CS, it would not have a range of 1 to 1999.
I guess no one at Hanna reads the silver list, ........ or they
simply do not know what they are doing.
Hopefully they do not think we are all fools. They certainly
misrepresent the facts.
>> PPM testers do a better job without the guess work using a TDS tester.
No if's, buts, or ands, or conditional words in your statement.
Such statements as yours concerns me, because many may believe it.
This is a list of facts, most of the time. <grin>
You quoted my complete message, which was unnecessary but did not
say, you did not believe it,
state different ideas, or tell us why, you think it is not true.
I may call Hanna next week and see if they can enlighten me.
I would expect they would be like one tech support I called last
week. I stayed on the phone for one hour.
Finally they told me. "We do not have an answer for your Question".
Of course I understood the problem and the answer, I only wanted to
see they would say.
Years back when I worked for a large world wide company, I called my
technical support.
I realized that the tech support was worthless, I was alone in the
world, I had to solve the problem all by myself.
Be more careful, read your links, and don't let the manufacturers
confuse or bamboozle you. <grin>
Wayne
=====================
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
