Yup, just like a good meter that doesn't detect everything is *pretty
good* and the two methods come out close to each other...pretty much....in
line with an actual test.
..like two 4 foot tall doors into the same dimly lit room . You can get
in, but ya gotta duck a little and once in, you can see well enough to not
fall over something.
Crushing a decimal or nudging a numeral in the carpet is a given.
Not putting Faraday down for what it actually does, but dip and read is
just a touch faster?
Ode
At 10:15 AM 8/17/2008 -0500, you wrote:
On Aug 16, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Ode Coyote wrote:
Farady doesn't account for where the silver is or what form it's in, so
it's no better than a meter.
Faraday's Law is the upper limit of how much silver will go into solution,
whether it is silver oxide, silver ions, or what have you. The potential
of ionization is the same. So, unless the set up has no current control
and it is Mr Toad's Wild Ride, the Faraday calcs ought to be pretty good.
Kathryn
I'm happy with the meter and knowing what it does so i can fudge the
numbers closer to reality.
ode
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database:
270.6.4/1617 - Release Date: 8/17/2008 12:58 PM
