On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 08:36:39AM +1030, Neville wrote: > Hey, I agree 100% my friend, you are 'absolutely' right in what you are > saying, no argument from me there, but to me there are no 'absolutes' > with this stuff and from all the information I have perused I don't > believe there is a brain on the planet that will ever get a total > understanding of EICS, (yeah and that could be argued to infinity I know > and I'm definitely not going there), and all the variables and 'gremlins' > that tend to creep in and do one thing or another. Oh, this is just a > personal perspective also, I would not presume to speak for anyone else, > only myself. You're not getting my dander up cos I don't really care > about the nitty gritties of EICS anymore, been there done that and I > ain't going to watch the re-run. I think most people have enough > information available to them even if it's just to simply satisfy their > own minds with the product they produce at home. > > Yeah, I know that I can get it analysed in a lab, and I have done in the > past, but it doesn't change the fact that I could probably make another > batch tomorrow while seemingly doing everything in the exact same manner > and I have no doubt that the result will come back different from the > first. Most people don't want, and can't afford anyway, to go to the > 'enth' degree in lab analysis of their home made EICS as they are > satisfied with all the information they read in forums such as this, and > using their meters no matter how inaccurate they may be. It's only the > minority who may want to know more 'science' of it but the majority just > want to make it, learn how to make it properly, get an idea of what it is > they are making, and then take it. I know where you are coming from > though Indi, and am only speaking for myself here. I have a sneaky > feeling though that when it comes to EICS there may not be a 'data is > data' thing, too many outside influences and/or variables which are not > understood or within the lay-mans control, and EICS is generally a > substance which that same 'lay-man' makes and uses for his/her own > benefit if you get my drift. This, to me, is why there will always be > this hoo-haa about EICS instead of just letting it go and being > satisfied with a basic substance which has been proven efficacious when > used for medicinal purposes. Personally again, I don't believe there > will ever be a 'data is data' thing, well not in my lifetime anyway. > > Cheers...Neville. >
I'm sure you are right about the "most people" point, but I hope you're mistaken about the "never will be hard data" point. Maybe part of my discomfort lies in the fact that I've become one of the people I used to poke fun at, LOL. Cheers, indi -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
