This is the thing Dee, from what I gather EIS/CS would need to be manufactured in a vaccuum sealed environment to keep ANY contaminants to a minimum...and then you open the bottle when you get home...! Chemistry of the environment will have it's way regardless.
This stuff is so easily 'upset' with regard to purity. This is why I work on a 'range' of ppm, why I have my own 'tolerance' levels in uS readings of DW, and why 'colour' is accepted, again within my 'tolerance', colour doesn't signify poor product it just means I work out what I use that 'coloured' solution for, for it's best effectiveness in any particular circumstance, and regulate dosage accordingly. Every time the vessel is opened 'something' else is let in with the air...how to keep it at it's optimum purity, or keep it 'perfect'? who knows...?? I moved away from most of those 'perfect' solution ideals etc etc some time ago, it can't be sustained/maintained anyway, not when making larger quantities, and then you lose the choice of ions over a more particulate solution while in storage. Again, one needs to determine which of the two would be more beneficial for a given circumstance, I think some people miss that concept when reading about ions vs particles, they BOTH have a perfectly good use, one just needs to work that out to suit. Bottom line: My opinion is there are just TOO MANY variables to contend with, or attempt to control, so why try? What I produce is STILL damn good stuff, besides, one can only produce a perfect solution in a perfect world, and I don't believe we are within cooee of that when speaking of EIS/CS <g>. N. From: [email protected] Subject: Re: CS>tyndall again Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:52:05 +0000 To: [email protected] Thanks Nevelle, its just the first lot of DW I 'brewed' came out at 000 on the TDS. This was just water boiled in the kettle and then put in the distiller. The second lot went through a Brita filter first before boiling and then steam distilling. after the first time, it read 002 on the TDS so I distilled it again. Then it came out at 003! I just can't understand it at all. The tyndall was in water from the first batch *before* I put the electrodes in, so I don't understand that at all either. dee On 16 Nov 2009, at 13:09, Neville Munn wrote: I get the impression you're concerned about this, why would that be? Some DW shows TE some don't, some end product shows TE and some don't have as much, it all depends on which way one parted their hair on the day they brewed it <g>. _________________________________________________________________ For more of what happens online Head to the Daily Blob on Windows Live http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/blog.aspx
