Well, if that's how THEY define pollutants, then all substances could be considered pollutants, I suppose. All it takes is to be in a harmful concentration. Oxygen, for example. At 21% everyone loves it, but increase it to 25% or higher and you have big trouble.
To call CO2 a pollutant is taking a theoretical leap in my opinion. The media has blown the thing out of proportion I think. Some folks theorize that increasing CO2 levels cause global warming. But, this hasn't been proven. Other folks theorize that CO2 levels increase after a warming trend. And some site I found today published a researcher's analysis of the historical studies of CO2 concentration. His conclusion was that the researcher's that everyone rely on conveniently ignored historical data that didn't coincide with their theories. All this stuff tends to give me headaches as I figure that what I think or do, in the end, won't really make any difference at all to anyone. Time for me to sit back with a glass of wine and contemplate how nice it would be if global warming would actually live up to it's threats/promises. Cheers --- On Wed, 12/9/09, Dan Nave <bhangcha...@gmail.com> wrote: From: Dan Nave <bhangcha...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: CS>No wonder there's an explosion of: To: silver-list@eskimo.com Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 10:44 PM The American Heritage® Science Dictionary Copyright © 2005 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. pollutant "A substance or condition that contaminates air, water, or soil. Pollutants can be artificial substances, such as pesticides and PCBs, or naturally occurring substances, such as oil or carbon dioxide, that occur in harmful concentrations in a given environment. Heat transmitted to natural waterways through warm-water discharge from power plants and uncontained radioactivity from nuclear wastes are also considered pollutants." On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Steve <chube...@yahoo.com> wrote: CO2 is not a pollutant. Without CO2 in the air, plants would die. It's a natural component of our ecosphere. Animals breathe in oxygen and breathe out CO2. Plants breathe in CO2 and breathe out oxygen. Of course, Nixon's EPA has declared CO2 to be a 'pollutant.' Kind of. It's mostly crazy double-speak, in my opinion. Here's a link to what appears to be an unbiased article on the topic - http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124001537515830975.html To put things in perspective, Nitrogen makes up 78% of our atmosphere. Oxygen makes up 21%. Argon is 0.93%, then CO2 comes along at 4th place at 0.038%. The remaining 0.032% is divided up between a bunch of other gases not worth mentioning for this discussion. I find it hard to put these kind of percentages in perspective so I'll compare this to a football field. 100 yards, 300 feet, or 14,400 inches, however you want to look at it. So, between nitrogen and oxygen, we use up the first 99 yards of the football field. That leaves 1 yard, or 3 feet. Argon takes up 2.79 feet which leaves us with .21 feet or 2.52 inches. So, CO2 takes up a little more than 1 1/3 inches out of the whole football field. So, the man-made climate change theorists are trying to panic us because CO2 has gone up by Of course, this is only the 'dry' atmosphere. Water vapor is, like CO2, considered to be a greenhouse gas, because it tends to hold warmth in and prevents it from escaping to outer space. Depending on the area, time of day and season, the atmosphere can range between 1% and 5% of water vapor. So, the EPA picks on CO2 but not water vapor even though they both have the same impact. I'm thinking water vapor has a MUCH larger impact than CO2 because on that old football field it would take up anywhere from 36 inches to 180 inches compared to CO2's lousy 1 1/3 inches. --- On Wed, 12/9/09, slickpic...@cox.net <slickpic...@cox.net> wrote: From: slickpic...@cox.net <slickpic...@cox.net> Subject: Re: CS>No wonder there's an explosion of: To: silver-list@eskimo.com Cc: "Annie B Smythe" <anniebsmy...@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 6:02 PM Don't worry, at least they're focu$ing on the most deadly pollutant of all...CO2. ---- Annie B Smythe <anniebsmy...@gmail.com> wrote: ============= Diabetes, Cancer, ADD, and every other disease under the sun. How can we live with all this crap in the food, and water, and air, and soil, in everything around us? And minority babies? We all breath the same air, and drink the same water, and use the same products, and eat food grown from the same soils. There ought to be riots in the streets over this. http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_19801.cfm And they target CS as a pesticide? I think people have lost their minds! Instead of concentrating on ridding us of the really lethal stuff, they're shilly shallying around with harmless stuff. And making a big stink about it. CS isn't lethal to people, plants or animals, like this other bunch of junk. Annie -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
