Great info, as usual, Tom. Thanks. I know there are several on the MMS list that will appreciate your specific measurements on this, and your conclusions.
I DO believe that belief has much to do with healing. And somehow I just had my doubts that it was the 'buffered MMS' that was doing the job. I felt that it would either be the MSM itself constantly in his system, or placebo, that was helping him. On the other hand, since I'm no chemist and therefor have no idea what was left in the solution he made, it could have been that he discovered something great--which is why I continued to ask questions. We don't learn if we don't ask. But mixing an antioxidant with an oxidant and expecting even better results together than singly just didn't make sense to me. I will say that there are 2 people on the list that have asked me to ask you if you'd care to join the MMS list. :-) I have not done so as I figured you are busy and if you go there you will be swamped with questions as 'the expert'. I know that a few of the people will have chemical questions to ask, but I also know that there will be many newbie questions that would be asked of you. So--if you want to join I'll gladly give you the list link, and if you decline to join I totally understand why. :-) On the MMS list one person told us how to change our 28% MMS to your more helpful 5% as there are some folks really taking your information to heart. I do think that MMS is very healing if handled correctly, so it's been wonderful to have your expertise on this. I'm thinking now that unactivated MMS in drinking water is the best way to go. I remember a lady from the original list that raised pigeons said one of the products for their health was, basically, a 5% unactivated MMS solution to be put into their drinking water. I remembered that the other day. She said she saved quite a few bird lives that way. So I've been thinking of adding it to my dogs and cats drinking water, rather than giving them a few drops (1 only for cats) of AMMS in their morning treat. That AMMS has worked good for them, but because of it's strength and potential to make them feel bad I have only done it on an as needed basis. I got rid of 2 lumps in 2 cats doing this. Now I feel that the straight MMS in water would be even better. Plus maybe easier on them, while still doing its job. So you really feel it's the chloris acid that does a better job rather than chlorine dioxide? and the chloris acid comes from straight sodium chlorite liquid converting in the body naturally? Or do you still think that most of the job is done by the small amount of chlorine dioxide that gets into the body with the AMMS, or even with the natural conversion of plain MMS in the body? I guess I'm still not sure on your stance on that. Samala, Renee -------Original Message------- I finally got around to picking up some MSM and running some tests.
