Polarity makes no difference. For instance if you take a Clark zapper,
and switch hands, then it works just as well. DNA is wound like a
spring. And just like a spring, it has a resonant frequency. Hit it
with that frequency (Rife), and it will break apart. Now DNA is pretty
resilient stuff, and if the parts that break apart don't drift apart,
they can recombine and become one again. Both the Clark and Beck
zappers rely on sharp edged square wave pulses to generate a harmonic
near the resonant frequency. The Fourier expansion of a square wave has
all multiples of that frequency, so if you pick a frequency that is not
to high it will have harmonics that are very close to resonance for a
pathogen. Apply the square wave, and the DNA tends to break apart. Now
when DNA breaks apart different pieces have different electric charges,
and thus have a tug toward either the positive or negative electrode.
However if the polarity changes direction, they will tend to drift back
together and recombine becoming whole again. So there MUST be a DC
component to the field to continue pulling the pieces apart until they
are so far apart that they will not get back together again (or in the
case of Rife hit it with so much energy at the resonant frequency it
doesn't just break but shatters). This can be done either of two ways.
1. If using a frequency of 20 Khz or so, make it unipolar instead of
bipolar, so that there is a DC field overriding the square wave at all
times. This is the Clark approach. 2. Use such a low frequency that the
pieces are pulled so far apart that even though the polarity reverses,
they will still not be able to find each other again due to random
motion during that time. This is the Beck approach. They both work,
Beck has the advantage that one of the harmonics will likely be closer
to the resonance than the Clark unit, and Clark has the advantage that
it is hitting it with the pulse 1,000 to 2,000 times as often, so even
if the resonant efficiency is less, it is made up for by the high
repetition rate.
As for the question of killing with one "polarity" or the other, then
yes. For the Beck unit when you shift polarity, the next leading edge,
either up or down, will cause DNA to break, and the electric field
during that half wave will cause the parts to drift apart. In the case
of the Clark unit, for the positive pulse, they break apart and the
field pulls them apart a little bit. During the ground pulse, the
falling edge will also cause breakage, but with no electric field, some
of the pieces will find each other again, but with the positive pulse
coming so quickly (50 microseconds) most likely they will experience the
separating field as well before they can recombine.
Marshall
Bob Banever wrote:
Marshall,
Well if that's true then why would the polarity make any
difference
at all... BOTH polarities supposedly kill germs... so if you're
killing with
one you'd also be killing with the other... no?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marshall Dudley"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: CS>Zapper
Bob Banever wrote:
Switching polarity doesn't negate the effects. If you kill a germ
using one polarity and then switch to another will the germ be
brought back to life? Don't think so!
Well, actually yeah, kind of. If you tear the dna apart in a germ,
it is basically dead, but if the dna reconnects and becomes whole
again, yeah, it will be alive again. If you reverse the polarity, the
dna fragments will drift back together and reconnect, thus the
necessity for the DC offset to Keep Em' Dead. Just like you can be
dead in the emergency room and come back to life if the proper
treatment is preformed.
Marshall
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]>
List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]>
