Marshall Dudley, You old timer You, You got it right ! So far your the only one that I seen that did get it right.
Way to go, Or Way to Know ! Tel Tofflemire Dewey, AZ. ________________________________ From: Marshall Dudley <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Mon, May 3, 2010 2:25:29 PM Subject: Re: CS>Zapper Polarity makes no difference. For instance if you take a Clark zapper, and switch hands, then it works just as well. DNA is wound like a spring. And just like a spring, it has a resonant frequency. Hit it with that frequency (Rife), and it will break apart. Now DNA is pretty resilient stuff, and if the parts that break apart don't drift apart, they can recombine and become one again. Both the Clark and Beck zappers rely on sharp edged square wave pulses to generate a harmonic near the resonant frequency. The Fourier expansion of a square wave has all multiples of that frequency, so if you pick a frequency that is not to high it will have harmonics that are very close to resonance for a pathogen. Apply the square wave, and the DNA tends to break apart. Now when DNA breaks apart different pieces have different electric charges, and thus have a tug toward either the positive or negative electrode. However if the polarity changes direction, they will tend to drift back together and recombine becoming whole again. So there MUST be a DC component to the field to continue pulling the pieces apart until they are so far apart that they will not get back together again (or in the case of Rife hit it with so much energy at the resonant frequency it doesn't just break but shatters). This can be done either of two ways. 1. If using a frequency of 20 Khz or so, make it unipolar instead of bipolar, so that there is a DC field overriding the square wave at all times. This is the Clark approach. 2. Use such a low frequency that the pieces are pulled so far apart that even though the polarity reverses, they will still not be able to find each other again due to random motion during that time. This is the Beck approach. They both work, Beck has the advantage that one of the harmonics will likely be closer to the resonance than the Clark unit, and Clark has the advantage that it is hitting it with the pulse 1,000 to 2,000 times as often, so even if the resonant efficiency is less, it is made up for by the high repetition rate. As for the question of killing with one "polarity" or the other, then yes. For the Beck unit when you shift polarity, the next leading edge, either up or down, will cause DNA to break, and the electric field during that half wave will cause the parts to drift apart. In the case of the Clark unit, for the positive pulse, they break apart and the field pulls them apart a little bit. During the ground pulse, the falling edge will also cause breakage, but with no electric field, some of the pieces will find each other again, but with the positive pulse coming so quickly (50 microseconds) most likely they will experience the separating field as well before they can recombine. Marshall Bob Banever wrote: > Marshall, > > Well if that's true then why would the polarity make any difference > > at all... BOTH polarities supposedly kill germs... so if you're killing with > > one you'd also be killing with the other... no? > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marshall Dudley" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 12:09 PM > Subject: Re: CS>Zapper > > >> Bob Banever wrote: >>> Switching polarity doesn't negate the effects. If you kill a germ using >>> one polarity and then switch to another will the germ be brought back to >>> life? Don't think so! >>> >> Well, actually yeah, kind of. If you tear the dna apart in a germ, it is >> basically dead, but if the dna reconnects and becomes whole again, yeah, it >> will be alive again. If you reverse the polarity, the dna fragments will >> drift back together and reconnect, thus the necessity for the DC offset to >> Keep Em' Dead. Just like you can be dead in the emergency room and come >> back to life if the proper treatment is preformed. >> >> Marshall >> >> >> -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. >> Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org >> >> Unsubscribe: >> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> >> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html >> >> Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> >> List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> >> > > > > >
