[96.5% of the total is 2.07 nanometers in size]
-I've always maintained that in all probability that same 96.5% applied to home
produced products would show similar results.
Particle sizing was the one test which was not performed on my samples, the
main reason being that where I had them analysed they didn't have the facility
for doing so, but more importantly, if one is observant and familiar with their
production procedures, it will be self evident that there are particles
contained within that solution of similar size. TEM images don't mean much to
me either as they are performed on a slide external of the blood. How would
those photos look if one could see them inside the body/blood with all the
other acids, peroxides etc etc doing their own thing and having their own way?
TEM images may make a pretty picture {or not, as the case may be} on a glass
slide, but how different would they look if it were possible to do it within
the blood? Now, if I could see a TEM image of 500ml or 1 litre of a given
solution on that slide I may adopt a better appreciation in accepting that TEM
images mean anything at all, or praps a blood sample put on that glass slide.
Most information available in the public domain play on the fact that the vast
majority of home producers are not in a position to have their solutions
analysed, and as a consequence tend to sow the seed of doubt in many peoples
minds that they *MAY* be producing an 'inferior?' product unless they use 'x'
machinery or use 'y' production procedures...I believe that is pure BS. I see
sites which show two lumps of silver hanging over the edge of a glass,
connected by aligator clips to wires, at no particular distance from each other
etc etc and the suggestion is that their solutions are 100% AOK, well if that's
the case the more 'constructed?' or more 'sophisticated?' machines must be
producing a 110% product.
I'm not knocking any manufacturers machine, but it must be realised that an
accepted quality end product is NOT exclusive to any particular machine...shop
bought or home made.
All machines, {praps I should rephrase that to *most* machines} whether they
consist of lumps of silver hanging over a glass connected by aligator clips to
wires, or the more constructed or sophisticated design machine produce EIS/CS
in a similar manner, incorporating similar principals...hence I'm satisfied
they should ALL be producing a similar product. Visual observation of ones
resultant solution is the key in my book...failing suitable laboratory
analysis. If one knows what to look for then one can be reasonably satisfied
that their home produced product, using their home made equipment and
incorporating their own particular production methods practices and principles
will be 100% AOK and is *equal* to the best solution and the best machinery to
be found...including particle size...bar none {opinion}.
Everyone will be aware of the many variations in machine construction and
design and environmental variables which may have an effect on the end result
so that goes without saying. The most important thing is...If EIS/CS is
produced using equipment which appears to be of accepted design {current
controlled or limited etc etc and so forth} then everyone can relax in the
knowledge that what they are producing is top shelf stuff, *including*
particles of similar dimensions.
OK, that's my rant for the day.
N.
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: CS>Patents on CS and Generators
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:54:32 -0400
It has been many years since I looked at their patent. What I remember is that
it is “just” a design patent that simply relates to the physical lay out of the
number of electrodes and spacing, etc. To circumvent that patent you could
just add one extra electrode for example. Quite useless except for being able
to advertize that you had a patent.
In case you are interested in nano silver particles take a look at the test
results of my generator design that shows that 96.5% of the total is 2.07
nanometers in size.
http://meissnerresearch.com/SilverGenerator/JM-9-2-0.pdf
There is no patent and anyone skilled in the art can duplicate this design from
the information published on my website. Or you could just buy one.
Jim Meissner www.MeissnerResearch.com
