Every CS generator produces ONLY silver ions and OH anions at the
electrodes.
"Particles" come later and form according to environment.
The "Sophisticated" machines control as much of that environment as
possible, but an Ion is still an Ion.
So..in essence and in truth, the sophistication is more about convenience,
repeatability between batches and controlling 3% to 15% of the total silver
as best as possible.
The rest is Ionic.... and an ion is an ion.
They only come in one size..the smallest possible size and still be Silver.
Make it bigger and it's not a Silver ion...make it smaller and it's not
Silver at all.
It all works.
The question is, how much do you want to watch it and need to know what you
are looking at ?
If it's automatic control.. plug it in and go do something useful. It'll
do the watching for you and control whatever it can for you.
But it can't control everything it can possibly encounter.
It's a big complicated world of water out there and anything that can
happen beyond the limits of that control, will happen.
What a TEM takes a photo of is Oxidized Ions made OUT of what WAS in the water.
It bears NO resemblance to what IS in the water.
Totally bogus info.
Ode
At 04:14 PM 9/29/2010 +1030, you wrote:
[96.5% of the total is 2.07 nanometers in size]
-I've always maintained that in all probability that same 96.5% applied to
home produced products would show similar results.
Particle sizing was the one test which was not performed on my samples,
the main reason being that where I had them analysed they didn't have the
facility for doing so, but more importantly, if one is observant and
familiar with their production procedures, it will be self evident that
there are particles contained within that solution of similar size. TEM
images don't mean much to me either as they are performed on a slide
external of the blood. How would those photos look if one could see them
inside the body/blood with all the other acids, peroxides etc etc doing
their own thing and having their own way? TEM images may make a pretty
picture {or not, as the case may be} on a glass slide, but how different
would they look if it were possible to do it within the blood? Now, if I
could see a TEM image of 500ml or 1 litre of a given solution on that
slide I may adopt a better appreciation in accepting that TEM images mean
anything at all, or praps a blood sample put on that glass slide.
Most information available in the public domain play on the fact that the
vast majority of home producers are not in a position to have their
solutions analysed, and as a consequence tend to sow the seed of doubt in
many peoples minds that they *MAY* be producing an 'inferior?' product
unless they use 'x' machinery or use 'y' production procedures...I believe
that is pure BS. I see sites which show two lumps of silver hanging over
the edge of a glass, connected by aligator clips to wires, at no
particular distance from each other etc etc and the suggestion is that
their solutions are 100% AOK, well if that's the case the more
'constructed?' or more 'sophisticated?' machines must be producing a 110%
product.
I'm not knocking any manufacturers machine, but it must be realised that
an accepted quality end product is NOT exclusive to any particular
machine...shop bought or home made.
All machines, {praps I should rephrase that to *most* machines} whether
they consist of lumps of silver hanging over a glass connected by aligator
clips to wires, or the more constructed or sophisticated design machine
produce EIS/CS in a similar manner, incorporating similar
principals...hence I'm satisfied they should ALL be producing a similar
product. Visual observation of ones resultant solution is the key in my
book...failing suitable laboratory analysis. If one knows what to look
for then one can be reasonably satisfied that their home produced product,
using their home made equipment and incorporating their own particular
production methods practices and principles will be 100% AOK and is
*equal* to the best solution and the best machinery to be
found...including particle size...bar none {opinion}.
Everyone will be aware of the many variations in machine construction and
design and environmental variables which may have an effect on the end
result so that goes without saying. The most important thing is...If
EIS/CS is produced using equipment which appears to be of accepted design
{current controlled or limited etc etc and so forth} then everyone can
relax in the knowledge that what they are producing is top shelf stuff,
*including* particles of similar dimensions.
OK, that's my rant for the day.
N.
----------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: CS>Patents on CS and Generators
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:54:32 -0400
It has been many years since I looked at their patent. What I remember is
that it is "just" a design patent that simply relates to the physical lay
out of the number of electrodes and spacing, etc. To circumvent that
patent you could just add one extra electrode for example. Quite useless
except for being able to advertize that you had a patent.
In case you are interested in nano silver particles take a look at the
test results of my generator design that shows that 96.5% of the total is
2.07 nanometers in size.
<http://meissnerresearch.com/SilverGenerator/JM-9-2-0.pdf>http://meissnerresearch.com/SilverGenerator/JM-9-2-0.pdf
There is no patent and anyone skilled in the art can duplicate this design
from the information published on my website. Or you could just buy one.
Jim Meissner <http://www.meissnerresearch.com/>www.MeissnerResearch.com
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]>
List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]>
