Anyone who states that obviously knows nothing about chemistry at
all. Ionic is compounds, an particles are colloid. The first is in
solution and the second makes up the colloid. That ionic adds nothing
to the healing process is nonsense, silver sulfathiazole and sivler
nitrate have been mainstays for the medical profession for a century and
they are of course both ionic forms of silver. Also Robert Becker
showed quite conclusively in his book "The Body Electric" that ionic
silver aids tremendously in healing, and of course the silver bandages
and other forms of healing that the medical community now use for things
like burns would not work either if ionic silver were useless.
Marshall
On 9/30/2010 11:24 PM, MaryAnn Helland wrote:
Yes -- but Marshall -- what about his assertion that large particle and ionic
silver are the same thing? And that ionic silver "adds nothing to the healing
process"?
MA
----- Original Message ----
From: Marshall Dudley [email protected]
I don't know where he is getting these ideas. That there is a
fundamental difference between metallic and ionic silver is a mainstay
of this group, and to say that no one here is willing to accept that
fact is laughable. He is ranting a lot, but not providing any
information that I can see, more like shoot the messenger.
Marshall
On 9/30/2010 12:07 PM, MaryAnn Helland wrote:
The following is a request for information from the person questioning me on
the
use of our home-made CS, and the response from the guy at ABC. Who is Don,
anyway -- anyone know? I would appreciate responses from our CS-experts
here,
so that I can respond back. Thanks.
MA
This is what I received on CS from the ABL contact....and it is not
kind....so I
am not posting it to the list. I prefer to not incite people which only
drives
them deeper into denial and cancels the opportunity for me to teach and them
to
learn. But you can see that there is difficulty in understanding the
science
with the general public.
Begin forwarded message:
From: info<[email protected]>
Date: September 28, 2010 10:29:47 AM MDT
Subject: Re: need some clarification here...for my clients
Whew, that is a long thread. Right up front I see the common problem,
though. I
was once a member of a yahoo list called silver pets. They were, just as
this
one is, unable to grasp the difference between ionic home made silver, and
pure
elemental silver solutions. To attempt to explain, to people like this, the
very
fundamental differences in the two types of silver preparations is greeted
as
heresy. They are so locked into their erroneous beliefs that nothing could
convince them differently. I finally wrote them off as Luddites, and moved
on.
Your group seems of much the same mindset. The fact that large amounts of
silver
are being retained in their horses indicates large particle, ionic silver
ingestion. Ionic particles, because of their positive particle electron
charge,
readily begin bonding with other organic substances, as soon as they enter
the
organism. This creates salts and compounds which are hard to excrete and
add
nothing to the healing process, because they are no longer silver, but
something
else. This is why they are
The ABL products pass through the body unchanged, due to their negative
electron
charge. They are excreted quickly. They do not get bound up in other
chemical
relationships. They have absolutely no effect on the mineral balance of
the
organism, as they do not form compounds.
Fat chance that you will convince your "colleagues" of this. They are
locked
into the theory that; "Why should I pay for something that I can make for
pennies?" "It all the same stuff."
I could go through this thread, point by point, and present credible,
independent, peer reviewed science to support these facts, but why bother?
They
either will not, or cannot grasp the scientific principle involved.
You can always cut/paste excerpts from the studies listed on my Clinical
Studies
page. I will be putting up several more studies this week, since ABL has
taken
down their research page. I am glad I save some of those. I attached the
Penn
State. peer reviewed and journal published study. It was the basis for the
3rd
US Patent. This patent actually protects the elemental silver particle.
Good luck with this gang. I fear that you are tilting at windmills. Some
people
will defend their ignorance to their graves. I lost three friends over the
past
18 months. They all went into the hospital for serious conditions (cancer,
MS),
but they all died within days from sepsis of resistant infections that
they
contracted after entering the hospital, not their original complaint. Two,
that
I found out about early, were offered free silver. It was declined. They
were
both in Tulsa and Lori could have had it in their hands within an hour.
Sigh...
I attached a couple of documents that you might find helpful.
Don
On 9/28/2010 4:59 PM, Biochemist wrote:
Hello Don, Having a problem with a group of people on my list who are
defending
the use of CS on horses for long term....following is a document of our
conversations...need some help here...from ABC.. Thanks,
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:[email protected]?subjectsubscribe>
Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
Off-Topic discussions:<mailto:[email protected]>
List Owner: Mike Devour<mailto:[email protected]>
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:[email protected]?subjectsubscribe>
Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
Off-Topic discussions:<mailto:[email protected]>
List Owner: Mike Devour<mailto:[email protected]>
